Tip: Use your browser's print function (Ctrl+P / Cmd+P) to save as PDF for offline study.
PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT — CFA L3 CHEAT SHEET
Individual Investment Policy Statement (IPS)
RRTTLLU Framework
| Component | Definition | Key Decision Rules |
|-----------|-----------|-------------------|
| Return Requirement | Minimum portfolio return to meet goals (living expenses, inflation, growth, bequest) | Express as: after-tax, nominal or real, before/after fees |
| Risk Tolerance | Risk capacity + Risk willingness | Use the LOWER of the two; educate if client irrationally underestimates capacity |
| Time Horizon | Investment period per goal; multi-stage (accumulation, early retirement, late retirement) | Longer horizon → higher equity allocation possible |
| Taxes | Marginal rate, cap gains treatment, tax-deferred/exempt accounts | Use asset location strategy (see below) |
| Liquidity | Near-term cash needs + emergency reserves | Constrains illiquid allocations (PE, hedge funds, real estate) |
| Legal/Regulatory | Fiduciary duties, constraints from law/trust documents | Document compliance obligations |
| Unique Circumstances | Concentrated positions, ESG, family obligations, business ownership | Must be explicitly documented in IPS |
|---|
---
Risk Tolerance: The Critical Divergence
When Risk Capacity ≠ Risk Willingness:
- Capacity = ability to financially sustain losses (income, wealth, horizon, liquidity)
- Willingness = psychological comfort with volatility
- IPS reflects: MIN(capacity, willingness)
- Advisor duty: Educate on long-term cost of over-conservatism, but do not override stated preference
---
Human Capital
| Client Type | Human Capital Relevance | Portfolio Implication |
|-------------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| Age 30–55, employed | HIGH (PV future income >> financial assets) | Can allocate financial capital more aggressively (income is "bond-like") |
| Age 60+, retiring | LOW (income nearly realized) | Shift toward lower-risk allocation; financial capital now primary |
| Retiree with pension | MEDIUM (pension = stable income floor) | Pension acts as implicit bond; can take risk with discretionary assets |
|---|
Key insight: Human capital is an illiquid "bond" — affects appropriate stock/bond mix of financial portfolio.
---
Tax Planning & Asset Location
Return Requirement Calculation
Formula:
$$\text{Nominal Return} = \frac{\text{Annual Shortfall}}{PV} + \text{Inflation Rate}$$
Example: $120K annual gap / $5M portfolio + 2.5% inflation = 2.4% + 2.5% = 4.9% real or ~6.0% nominal
---
Tax-Equivalent Yield (Taxable vs. Tax-Exempt)
$$\text{Tax-Equivalent Yield} = \frac{\text{Tax-Free Yield}}{1 - \text{Marginal Tax Rate}}$$
Example: Muni at 3.8%, client in 37% bracket:
$3.8\% \div (1 - 0.37) = 3.8\% \div 0.63 = \mathbf{6.03\%}$ (compare to taxable yield)
---
Asset Location Strategy (Tax Efficiency)
| Account Type | Best Assets | Rationale |
|--------------|-------------|-----------|
| Tax-Deferred (401(k), Trad IRA) | High-turnover, taxable bonds, REITs | Defer all gains/income until withdrawal |
| Taxable | Low-turnover equities, munis, growth stocks | Minimize current tax; benefit from cap gains rates |
| Roth (highest priority) | Highest-growth assets | Future appreciation tax-exempt; best tax advantage long-term |
|---|
Value: +0.5–1.5% annual after-tax return vs. naive placement
---
Key Tax Concepts
Tax Drag
- Definition: Reduction in compound returns due to taxes on income and realized gains
- Minimize via: Low-turnover funds, tax-loss harvesting, strategic asset location
Tax-Loss Harvesting
- Sell at loss → offset gains elsewhere
- Reinvest in similar but not "substantially identical" security (avoid wash-sale rule)
- Lock in losses while maintaining market exposure
- Deduct unused losses up to $3K annually (carry forward indefinitely)
Wash-Sale Rule (US)
- Cannot repurchase same/substantially identical security within 30 days before/after loss sale
- Use similar fund/ETF from different provider
---
Quick Decision Checklist
When constructing individual IPS:
- [ ] Return requirement = after-tax, reflects inflation, includes all goals
- [ ] Risk = min(capacity, willingness); educate on mismatch
- [ ] Time horizon = multi-stage; distinguish human capital phase
- [ ] Liquidity = constrains illiquid assets
- [ ] Taxes = asset location + tax-loss harvesting in plan
- [ ] Unique circumstances = documented (concentrated stock, ESG, etc.)
Red flags:
- Return requirement uses pretax numbers → incorrect
- IPS ignores divergence between risk capacity and willingness → suitability issue
- No asset location strategy → leaving tax efficiency on table
- Ignores human capital for 40-year-old → misallocates risk